Category Archives: boozy lunch

No Booze, You Lose…?

Hmm, maybe the boozy lunch isn’t so bad after all? In relation to my post earlier today, I have just found an interesting study, which has established that drinkers earn 10 – 14% more than non-drinkers. The average female drinker earns 8% more than the average female non-drinker, whereas the average male drinker earns 21% more than the average male non-drinker.

The study concludes that drinking leads to higher “social capital” and better social networks. It concludes the restrictions on drinking are likely to have harmful economic effects by (a) reducing fun and (b) potentially reducing income by reducing networking opportunities.

As I also stressed earlier, moderation is the best policy: moderate drinkers earn the best salaries. I guess it’s all a question of balance – not having functions which only centre around alcohol, but not banning it altogether either!

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under boozy lunch, law, law firms

Response to Shop Steward’s post on Morale

This post is in response to Shop Steward’s post on morale. I agree with Shop Steward in regard to many issues:

  • Work retreats: Why the hell would I want to spend all weekend with my workmates when I spend all week with them? Nothing personal against my workmates. It’s just that when one works at a law firm, one spends enough time with workmates as it is without spending all weekend with them as well! Personally, I like to spend time on weekends relaxing with my family and friends. I hate work retreats. And if that makes me “not a team player”, so be it.
  • Stinginess of partners: When I went on maternity leave, I invited everyone in my section to come (and a couple of other friends from around my firm). Not one partner bothered to turn up. In the end all the junior lawyers, paralegals and secretaries pooled together so that I didn’t have to buy my own farewell lunch (thanks guys, you are good friends). The firm didn’t even bother to send a bunch of flowers or a card when my baby was born. That really gave me a message of how the firm and the partners valued me. No wonder I didn’t go back.
  • Morale generally: It was not often that I got told that I had done a good job by my supervising partners. Actually, clients thanked me for good work on a number of occasions – which I guess is what was really important – but I felt as though no one at the firm cared about the quality of the work I did, just as long as I racked up those six minute units.

Writing this post, I realise that I still feel pretty bitter and angry. It doesn’t take much for a person like me to be kept happy – just a pat on the back when I do a good job, a bit of generosity from firm partners from time to time to let me know that they appreciate my efforts (after all, I’m the one lining their pockets). I am an intrinsically loyal person, but every firm for which I have worked has steadily eroded any loyalty I have had toward it. It’s simple – if an organisation treats people like rubbish, they’ll cease to have any loyalty towards it.

However, I disagree with Shop Steward on the demise of the boozy lunch. I’m happy about the demise of this particular institution. Now, I don’t mind the odd lunch on the firm or the odd free drink either. But one thing I really object to is the alcoholic culture of firms which persists despite the demise of the boozy lunch.

So much of the social life of a firm revolves around alcohol. It is hard for lawyers who don’t drink for religious or health reasons to fit in. When I did articles, one of my fellow clerks didn’t drink alcohol because she didn’t like the taste. The majority of social occasions involved drinking. She ended up being ostracised by some of the other clerks because she didn’t drink and she didn’t eat certain foods for health reasons. Another friend of mine is a petite and slender girl, and as a result, she can’t take much alcohol. At her former firm, the partners went out of their way to get her extremely intoxicated for their own amusement. She ended up passing out and was very, very unwell. Luckily her mother found her unconscious on her bedroom floor. She could have died of alcohol poisoning.

I’m not that keen on booze fests these days. I got that out of my system during university (with a vengeance: I was quite terrible). As I say, I like a nice glass of wine or two, but I don’t want to get smashed any more. Particularly not in a work context, because I am likely to have my already scant inhibitions broken down and I will go and tell everyone exactly what I think! I don’t see why all social occasions at a law firm have to revolve around alcohol. I think many lawyers drink more than is healthy (particularly if you are stuck at a desk all the time). It is unhealthy from a few perspectives: it is fattening, can destroy one’s liver and can adversely affect one’s mental health. Everything is okay in moderation. But the end of the boozy lunch doesn’t sadden me at all.

In the end, all I want to keep my morale up is a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T! And maybe a free lunch or a free glass of wine from time to time.

7 Comments

Filed under boozy lunch, law, law firms